Topic updated: 2022-08-06
While still in the middle of a fight against the PSX and the N64, the Sega Saturn was killed in a few months.
La version française de cette article est accessible ici.
At the beginning I didn't want to write a big introduction for this topic, but it clearly became difficult, even impossible (in fact, the introduction will probably be one of the bigger parts of this article). So I am sorry. It will be a big reminder for those who lived that era or a quick presentation for the young ones who didn't.
During the 80's a company named Sega became one of the two biggest video games company in the world, both on the hardware - console and arcade, the latter having almost disapeared today in the western world - and the software. Just behind big N (Nintendo). While Nintendo took the lead in Japan, Sega put all its energy to fight them, taking this leadership sometimes in North America and Europe. With the MasterSystem first, and the MegaDrive (Genesis in North America) then, Sega has become one of the most popular companies in the world, a popularity represented by Sonic The Edgehog, the Sega's alter ego to Mario the plumber of Nintendo.
Sega managed to create a mascot and make it alsmost as famous as Mario
Many things were different between those companies. We can mention two of them : first while Nintendo depicted itself as a family-friendly company, Sega targeted teenagers, renegades, punks, and agressively attacked, through advertising, its main competitor. Then, while Nintendo issued hardware, stable and quite robust, of the era, and let it live its life, Sega tried many times to be ahead of its time and also was one of the first company to rewamp some of its devices to lower cost and/or extend the lifespan of the device, with a relative success. The best example has been in our hands : while Nintendo met a huge worldwide succes with a monochrom console named the Game Boy, Sega tried to rock the world with a colored one named the Game Gear. However, despite some great successes, a lot of worldwide hits, Sega stayed behind Nintendo for various reasons that would take too much time to explains, so let's go to the main topic.
While Sega of America (SOA) was trying to imagine how to extend the capacities of the Genesis (MegaDrive) and its lifespan, considering the huge success of this console in America and Europe, the headquarters in Tokyo - Sega of Japan (SOJ) - were already figuring the next generation of console, the 32 bits ones. In 1992 two projects were on the track: the Sega 32x, a hardware extension for the Genesis, and the Saturn, a brand new system. There were not an alternative project to each other, they were both to be realized. The first one was to be able to do basic 3D, untextured, and the second one to be a full 3D ready system, with the ability to texture the polygons. Sega was hoping to capitalize its huge experience and success in the 3D through its arcade systems to bring it to our homes then. Let's note that Sega also invented, kind of, the different levels of hardware like we see it today though consoles with pro or lite versions: the 32X was a lower budget device and the Saturn the big fully featured one.
As the Genesis was going well in America, the 32x project was "given" (i.e put in their hands without asking) to SOA by SOJ, while the latter would focus on the Saturn. The development of the Saturn was steady, going well despite some difficulties, and while Nintendo announced a CD extension for the SuperFamicom (Super Nintendo in Europe), Sega was not concerned at all. Things didn't changed when later Sony decided to go alone and to produce its own hardware system, named "Play-Station" back then. But in late 1992, something important happened. A company named Silicon Graphics who had become famous in the motion picture industry for its 3D realizations through great hardware and software contacted Sega to offer a deal to use their 3D chip into their new console. Sega engineers were showed all the capacities of the component, but while impressed by the incredible features and the power of the chip, were pesimistics about some not (yet) resolved issues. On top of that, according to some sources, SOJ wanted the exclusivity for the chip while Silicon wanted to distribute it under licence, and finally Sega declined the offer, prefering to continue to use the Hitachi chip they had selected during the Saturn design phase, even if this latter was greatly inferior to the Silicon Graphics one. What was the problem then ? Well Sega didn't see Nintendo coming. In september 1993 Big N indeed announced officially (work had already started earlier) a partnership with Silicon Graphics, and by this, implicitly declaring its entrance into the race to the next generation of consoles. It was a blow into Sega's face. The impact was quite important: the company, understanding that Big N took the opportunity they didn't and will have an hardware better than them, decided, almost in a hurry, to add a second 3D Hitatchi chip, allowing more calculus power to the Saturn. This small event will have a huge impact on the console life and on the Sega demise.
The 32x was supposed to be a low cost entry device in the 32 bits world.
To make things worst, still in late 1993, Sony made a demonstration of the capacities of the future Playstation to a whole set of developers coming from various third-party editors (you can see the T-Rex Playstation demo on Youtube). It was a blow to these developpers, in a good way, but a bad one to Sega who understood this day that the Saturn, even before its release, will have a very very serious rival. While considering Nintendo as the only rival, a rival a little behind on the hardware matter, Sega not only found out that Big N was already at the same level and that a new competitor was already on the front-line, with serious arguments... These warnings were however not enough and instead of completely rethinking the project, Sega decided this last-minute (often bad in whatever industry) change in the architecture of the Saturn and decided to continue.
Another point, which would become very important when the price war would occur: the Saturn was costly to develop, Sega relying on third-party manufacturers. Facing it, Sony was manufacuring its own components and was able to produce a cheaper console.
Now, let's do a jump ahead on time and just sum-up what happened. Fasten your seatbelt. Sega released a complex console without any SDK (software development kit) and almost no documentation, on the market. Then SOJ imposed an early, unexpected, and to selected retailers only (which had to sell the console without any margin, Sega selling it to them to the public price) release of the Saturn in late-1994 in America, 6 months after the release in Japan, triggering an angry reaction of some retailers and giving frustration to buyers. On top of that, the line-up of the console was ridiculous, and won't increase for months, and the console itself quite expensive. Just after that Sony did the opposite: releasing a console designed for 3D, with a relatively simpler architecture, with a SDK, with documentation (and samples), with a good line-up, and cheaper than the Saturn. Things were done at the beginning. Saturn would never recover. Sega too.
On top of that, the 32X was a fiasco discontinued after only one year, disturbing customers who did not understand why Sega released two 32 bits consoles.
Let's go back to the main issue, the main one, the architecture of the Saturn. Yes you can recover of marketing or launching issues, sometimes with difficulty, but the architecture of the console is here and you have to deal with it. The first 32 bits games on both Saturn and PSX were often uglies, but the learning curve - Sony did what it was needed to be done - was shallow on the PSX while very steep on the Saturn. Developers had to figure out how to master the hardware, and dealing with these two display processors were often a nightmare. Some of the studio decided to use only one, some others decided to use them with various techniques of their own like one to handle the background and the other the "active" 3D objects. Another things, both processors did not have the exact same features... Complex isn'it ? Another issue was transparancy, native on PSX but to be implemented in various ways by various developers on Saturn. Another thing: the Sega console could only draw rectangular polygones while the PSX could do other forms. Another issue was (would become) the means allowed to the Saturn projects: many games released on this console were ports from the PSX. And when the time of the port came, many studios did the minimum, producing something that was far from using all the capacities of the Sega console, feeding the rumor that the Saturn was greetly inferior to its rival. One note for the readers who are not in the software (or even in any tech area) industry: when a developer or any engineer is facing a new technology, he is also facing deadline to ship the software, hence reducing the flexibility to master the new technology, experience finally coming over and over the subsequents projects.
The Sega Saturn's motherboard. Brilliant design for some people, great failure for others.
I won't list all the mistakes done by Sega with the Saturn, there is plenty of litterature about it. Let's go on.
After one year, the situation is bad for the console. While the Playsation is shining all over the world, the Saturn is only meeting success in Japan, the opposite of what a happened with previous Sega's devices. SOJ, who has initially claimed that its hardware could dominate the market for the next five years is already considering the replacement of the Saturn (the Saturn 2 project at first, the Katana project then).
However, from late 1995, things were changing positively. First, financial results of Sega are still goods (they sold 2.000.000 of ... Genesis that year). Then, something has changed for the Saturn. The console is still the leader on its domestic market, and while far behind on other ones, third-party editors are producing more and more games. But the main demonstration comes from Sega itself: the adaptation of many games of the "Virtua" series, from the arcade to the Saturn. The example of Virtua Cop is a good one, showing that the machine could handle properly good 3D and that editors don't have to be worried about what is said about the Sega console. The company has also produced, finally, a documentation and some libraries to help developers. Things a changing, in a very good way.
The first version of the Sega Saturn for the western markets. The second one had grey circle buttons instead.
Things continued in this direction during 1996: Sega finally managed to put the Saturn properly on the track. Despite the huge lack of a Sonic version and of system-seller games (games that make people to buy the console to play at this specific game) and that most of the reference games were from Sega itself, editors will progressively release various great games, like Tomb Raider or Pandemonium, Biohazard (Resident Evil in Europe)... Sega had then the means to compete with the PSX while the N64 entered the market. The company then needed to go to the next level. The best way was to create packages of games (bundles) sold with the console, and to continue to successfully port great arcade games (Virtua Cop 2, Sega Rally), redesign a little bit the console (to reduce production costs, a huge financial hole for Sega) and produce new devices.
Sega will release that year: a new 3D analogic controller, along the beautiful and widely praised game Nights into dream, a modem to play online (the Sega Netlink), and a memory extension of 1MB to increase the power of the console. The Saturn also saw that year the first sequels of games which had positive critics, like Bug Too or Panzer Dragoon Swei.
But that's not everything! On a hardware perspective, the year to come seems to be quite attractive: Sega just anounced that the awesome Virtua Fighter 3, released with a lot of success on arcade, was going to be ported on the Saturn in 1997, to equal quality with the arcade version, with the help of a new 3D extension of the console greatly improving the 3D abilities of the system, opening a new field of perspectives for the system! A few weeks later, Core Studio executives were in Tokyo and saw by themselves the 3D extension and a running demo of VF3, with two playable characters.
On top of that, a 4MB RAM extension is going to be released soon.
Sega ends the year with a positive communication claiming the leadership of the Saturn on the Japanese market and a huge progression in America and Europe. Are bad days behind?
The Sega Saturn analogic controller had a a good design, inspiring the future Dreamcast's one.
However, we must also notice three bad news for Sega. The first one being the leaving of Tom Kalinske, the head of SOA, who had to endure all the bad inspirations of SOJ. We will come to that later. The second one is of financial matter: Sega is losing a lot of money with the Saturn, and the fact that they had to follow Sony on the war price made things worst. The third one is that despite the positive figures in terms of sales, the gap with the PSX is not filled: the Playstation is going to take the lead in Japan, probably soon, and its advance in other markets seems uncatchable. It is very unlikely that despite the great 1996 year the Saturn would be able to challenge the Playstation for the leadership of these markets, the bad start in 1994-95 will be a permanent heavy ball attached to its feet.
After 2 years of struggle with Sony, Sega seems to have finally be able to push its full forces in the fight and having recovered from the long list of errors during the early days of the Saturn. The console is now well installed in this competitive market and third-party editors are developing more and more games, including system-seller ones. Increasing sales rates could let observers to be optimistics, and fan enthusiastics, about the year to come, promising an intensive battle between Sony, Sega and Nintendo. However, those happy days are not going to last for the Sega fans...
In 1996, the release of hits on the Sega Saturn, both developped for Saturn and PSX, showed to the world that the two manufacturers were almost fighting with equal means and that the bad start from the Saturn was clearly from the past, and the hardware extensions announced were allowing to dream for new hits even of better quality than that of the Sony console. But over the months, it become clear that this view was very optimistic and a sequence of catastrophic events occured. One after the others, third-party editors started to leave or deconsidered the console. The main reason ? No, that's not the exclusivity deal signed (for some of them) with Sony, it will come later. There are actually two reasons: the first one is that the console performances (technical and financial) are dispointing most of the developers, and the second one is that Sega itself seems to be shattered by an internal struggle and that this fight is clearly visible to everyone.
Let's come back in 1996. In that great year for the system the Sega's fans saw some hits to be both released (or announced to be released) on PSX and Saturn, let's list some of them: Tomb Raider, Biohazard (Resident Evil in Europe, late 1997), Destruction Derby, Alone in the Dark 2, Pandemonium (june 1997, see later in this article), Die Hard Trilogy (in january 1997 to be accurate), Doom, Quake.
Now, various magazines are announcing some sequels, and the Saturn is going to have all of them, for this year, on the next one. But over the months, bad news are succeeding and all of them are cancelled. What the hell happened ? Let's review some of them.
The Sega Saturn never got the sequel of Tomb Raider. If you are curious, you can watch real-time comparison between the Saturn and PSX releases of the first episode.
Side note : there was no sequel to Die Hard Trilogy obviously. But the case is still worth mentionning: some sources mentions that the port on the Saturn needed the help of some Sega's consultants.
The absence of sequels to those hits was a major blast as they were true system-sellers. But the Saturn was also crippled by more or less major events on the field:
Among the other hits (on other platforms) that were cancelled on the Saturn, we can also mention EA Sports FIFA World Cup 98, Croc 2, Fighting Force, Diablo, GTA, Heart Of Darkness... However, for this list, it is not always clear if they were cancelled because of the Saturn's situation or for other reasons. For Heart of Darkness for instance, the game was supposed to be a Saturn exclusivity (on console, but later to be released on PC), but the development took so much time that when the game would have been ready for release, the Saturn market was no longer viable. The same thing happened to Gran Theft Auto and to Nuclear Strike, the sequel of the good Soviet Strike (one of the rare games that was better on Saturn than on Playstation).
We already have talked a lot of what happened on the field. Let's now go to see what was going with the white collars. Over the years the tensions between Sega of America (SOA) and the mother vessel Sega of Japan (SOJ) have been well known to the public back then, SOJ leaving less and less freedom to its american subsidiary. Difference of opinions, of vision of the future of the company were the main part of the issues. All of this has been highlighted, or illustrated, by the difference of the reception to Sega's products in different markets. While the Genesis and before it the MasterSystem were total successes in North America and Europe, they lagged behind Nintendo in Japan. With the Saturn, it was the total opposite, the Saturn beeing a true success only at home.
On top of that, the Saturn, from conception to release, was an idea under total control of SOJ while for previous devices SOJ was only in charge of the conception, leaving marketing and release work to the local subsidiaries. The fact that the MegaDrive was a total success in North America and that SOJ was pushing the Saturn in a hurry while there were still room for the MegaDrive didn't help. Among the Saturn ennemies was a man named Tom Kalinske we mentioned in the introduction. From the very beginning he considered the marketing position of the console and the pricing not well suited to the market, and on top of that, he knew that the architecture of the device was far too complex, but SOJ didn't considered that at all and Kalinske had to follow the orders given by SOJ, including those which led to the failure of the launching and the difficult beginings of the console in the USA and in Europe. Despite this he and his team tried everything to give the Saturn a chance but the Playstation was a too big piece. Kalinske finally left the company in mid-1996. Following his departure SOA was restructured and the project, on the software level, was now between the hands of a man named Bernie Stolar.
Croc "The Legend of the Gobbos" was one of the last game to be both released on PSX and Saturn. While a little bit under its counterpart, the Saturn version is good. Same thing for Riven, the sequel to Myst, which got rankings as good as the PSX version.
Stolar was a former VP of Sony Computer Entertainment America, and as soon as he joined Sega it seems that he tried to continue the job done by Kalinske : to fight not only for the Saturn survival but also to continue the progression in terms of market share, but... he also claimed that Sega "need to kill the Saturn" and to start the development of the next generation of console for the company (something that was already in progress as mentionned earlier in this article). He was helped to this decision a few months later, despite some official announcements highligting the (true) increasing sales of the console, by the figures that became indeed quite alarming : the gap between the PSX and the Saturn was becoming bigger and bigger. On top of that, Sega had to follow the many price decreases decided by its competitor, leading to a precarious financial situation for the manufacturer. 9 months after his arrival in SOA, Stolar was promoted to head of operations and he had the mission to help to prepare the future of the company, in other words, the difficult mission to save it. And he did not waste time to make it know.
Indeed in june 1997, he sent a socking message, indirectly. In the middle of an interview at the E3 in Atlanta, two simple sentences made him the nemesis of most of the Sega's fans: "We did a mistake with the Saturn" and "The Saturn is not our future", announcing a new device for the end of 1998. Those two phrases, repeated out of context didn't help to put confidence in third-party developers and potential buyers who were still hesitating between the Saturn and the PSX. In the meantime, the PSX received all the sequels to the hits mentionned earlier in this article and also exclusive system-sellers like Final Fantasy VII...
There is however something to remind, to be fair : many times I read on social networks that the cascade of cancellation on the Saturn were a consequence of Bernie Stolar's speech. That's wrong and unfair. If you look at the timeline, the cancellations were well spread over 1997 and early 98, so before and after Stolar's announcement.
In a few months the vision of the future of the Sega Saturn has completely changed. From hope and excitement fans were led to a dark future, leaving them three choices: 1) wait and see, 2) wait for the next console, the Dreamcast (then named the Katana Project) which was going to be announced soon, 3) or to sell their Saturn to buy a competing machine. The rest of the year confirmed them that the Saturn was to be abandonned, the quantity of releases dropping and system-sellers games disapperaring, even some hits released in Japan were not adapted to the western market (and even in this case, the port was still not as good that the PSX version, for instance Castlevania: Symphony of the night, which despite extra features for the Saturn version, was clearly done without trying to benefit of the superior 2D capacity of the Sega console). In the begin of the year 1998, releases of the Saturn had become more and more rare while the PSX was still on the edge of the popularity (and hits like Metal Gear Solid, Parasite Eve and Silent Hill were still to come). Among the last few games released on the western market, FIFA 98 and NHL 98, months behind the PSX, N64 and PC versions, were once again small dispointments, lacking behind their PSX equivalent (regarding Fifa 98, this critic has already been done one year earlier for Fifa 97).
Finally the official discontinuation of the Saturn, for which rumor could be heard in spring 1998 when the console was receiving its last notable games (Riven, Panzer Dragoon Saga*), was announced on the 5th of november 1998, but games production continued until 1999, almost only in Japan though. It is interesting to wonder what would have been the future of Sega if the Saturn had not known such a fate. Would the Dreamcast have been released so early ? Would Sega have maintained both the Saturn and the Dreamcast as Sony did with the PSX (until 2002) and the PS2? In any case, unlike what is sometimes considered like a certainty, the Saturn was not the fatal blow to Sega as a console manufacturer. It was the initial one, and the company never fully recovered. The failure of the console, despite the aborted career, costed a huge amount of money to the manufacturer. The firm had one chance to recover and to get back to the peak of its popularity like 5 years earlier. This chance was named "Dreamcast".
The Dreamcast had the difficult mission to put Sega back on the track.
You know what followed: it was not enough, and this time Sega was not faulty. The Sega Dreamcast had a good design and was may be a little bit ahead of its time. Despite encouraging figures in the beginning, the 128 bits console did not reach the expectation and SOJ had to let it go in 2001, "it was a matter of life or death" for the company. This time the culprits were players, who after the poor launching of the Saturn and its premature (for them) drop of support by Sega let them distrustful, at best, or even angry for some of them. I remember in fall 1999, while walking in a mall in southern France, the newly released Dreamcast was being promoted in a stand. A lot of people were around the various screens, and I clearly remember one guy saying "Well. That's great indeed... But I will wait for the Playstation 2". I think we all heard this sentence in those days, and it clearly sum-up what of lot of us thought (I still have a Dreamcast though, but I bought it around 2004 when it was already discontinued, and it is clearly a good system).
But let's not be so assertive, third-party editors played their role here. EA for instance did not want to develop games for the Dreamcast. I have read many reasons, none of them being certain, but in any case the absence of some hits like the FIFA series, Madden... didn't help.
May be it is pure nostalgy, but I miss Sega and wonder what they could do today in hardware (if they still had a department working on).
*Panzer Dragoon Saga has been depicted by some critics to be one of the most beautfiul games on the Saturn, equals to what could be done on the PSX, supporting people who were thinking that the Saturn was not inferior to its 32 bits rival. One critic said that if this game had been released on PSX, it would have been a major success.